InfoWok
// editorial standards

How we research, write, and stand behind what we publish

InfoWok publishes technical content people rely on to make real decisions and write real code. Here’s the standard we hold it to — and how to hold us accountable.

Last reviewed June 2026
At a glance
Named authors with real experience
Verified against primary sources
Code tested, versions noted
AI assists — humans are responsible
Independent of advertising
01

Editorial process

Every article is written by a named author with relevant experience in the subject. Articles are drafted, reviewed for technical accuracy and clarity, and edited before publication. We prioritise depth and correctness over publishing frequency.

02

Research & fact-checking

  • Technical claims are verified against primary sources — official docs, specifications, and reputable references — not second-hand summaries.
  • Code examples are tested where practical, and we note the versions of tools and libraries so readers can reproduce results.
  • External sources are cited in a References section at the end of the article.
03

Use of AI

We use AI tools to assist with research, outlining, and drafting. AI is a tool, not an author: every published article is reviewed, fact-checked, and edited by a human who takes responsibility for its accuracy. We don’t publish unreviewed AI-generated text, and we don’t present AI as a human expert.
04

Updates & corrections

Technology changes quickly, and so do our articles. When we make a meaningful update, the article’s “last updated” date reflects it. If you spot an error, tell us — we correct mistakes promptly and transparently.

05

Independence

Editorial decisions are made independently of advertising. Where content is sponsored or contains affiliate links, we disclose it clearly within the article — and ads are always labeled.

Spotted something wrong?

We fix errors quickly and openly. Report it through our contact page and we’ll take a look.

Report an error →